Baseball Jeremiad


A Curiously Intelligent Baseball blog

Phillies Extend Howard; Sabermatricians Go Ballistic

Craig Calcaterra tees off:

But he’s also — at best — the third most valuable player on the Phillies, and reasonable arguments can be made that he’s not even that high. He’s big and he’s slow and despite that extra work he’s put in, it’s more likely than not that he’s going to age poorly.

Don’t believe me? Here’s a list of Ryan Howard’s most comparable players through age 29 — his age for the 2009 season — according to Richie Sexson, Cecil Fielder, Mo Vaughn, Willie McCovey, David Ortiz, Tony Clark, Mark McGwire, Carlos Delgado, Fred McGriff and Norm Cash.  The only two guys on that list who didn’t fall off a cliff before age 36 are McCovey and McGriff, and they were a heck of lot skinnier than even Ryan Howard v.2.0 is. The rest of those names should constitute nightmare fuel for Phillies fans.

Rob Neyer unloads too:

Ryan Howard’s new contract is a testament the enduring power of the Are-Bee-Eye. It’s also a testament to old-school ignorance: ignorance of aging patterns, ignorance of position scarcity, ignorance of opportunity costs … hey, take your pick. The Phillies have done a lot of things right over the last few years. But this is a big bowl of wrong.

And Matthew Carruth of Fangraphs:

Even if you think baseball’s salary per win goes up to $4.25 million this coming offseason and rises at a 5% clip every winter through 2017, Howard will need to produce an average of 4.75 wins from 2012 through 2017 just in order to justify his salary. If you factor in that Howard gets (even more) long-term security from this deal, then that average production levels goes up to 5.3 wins.

In other words, Howard will need six seasons that were better than his 2009 season, except over his 32-37 years. I’m not sure I would lay even money on him achieving even half of that. This contract is both incredibly risky and unnecessary since Howard was already signed through 2011. Say hello to baseball’s newest worst contract.

And Duk at Yahoo! Sports:

Part of it may be an overreaction to the Phillies making a mistake by not buying out a few of Howard’s post-arbitration years at a cheaper rate, but playing the waiting game would have:

1) Given Amaro time to see if Howard’s skills decline over the next two years or suffer a big injury that would limit or cut his production in a similar way

2) Allowed the Phillies more time to weigh and address other upcoming needs, like re-signing Jayson Werth(notes) this offseason or strengthening a bullpen that could use retooling.


If Howard is worth $25 million, Pujols is worth $50 million a year.”
ESPN’s Keith Law on the Ryan Howard extension.

Then again, Tyler Kepner of the “Bats” Blog doesn’t think it’s a bad idea:

Howard, 30, is an elite power hitter for the Philadelphia Phillies, with at least 45 home runs in each of the last four seasons. But he has transformed himself from a one-dimensional slugger into an asset in the field and on the bases, too. It helped earn him a five-year, $125 million extension on Monday from a team that had once been uncertain about how long to keep him.

But, even Crashburn Alley is very hesitant:

Most Phillies fans will love the extension, as it keeps a fan favorite in town for a long time. Stat-savvy fans immediately dislike the deal. Most Phillies fans will come to loathe the deal in several years when the Phillies are hamstrung by Howard’s relatively large salary and declining production.

Already, Howard has shown signs of decline as his walk rate has declined every year since 2007 and sits at a paltry 3.6% thus far in 2010. His BABIP has been lower as more and more teams have employed an infield shift against him. Opposing teams have also been bringing in more left-handed relievers to face Howard and his production against them has swiftly dropped. His strikeout rate has declined gradually but so has his isolated power. Using FanGraphs’ pitch type linear weights, Howard’s production against the fastball has dropped every year since 2006. He has swung at more and more pitches outside of the strike zone every year since he came into the Majors. Finally, his whiff rate (swinging strike percentage) has increased every year since 2006.

This will be a fun ride for two, maybe even three more years, but it will quickly become tumultuous.

And if you’re into charts and graphs, check this out (courtesy of Crashburn Alley):



Filed under: Uncategorized, , , , , , , ,

Talkin’ Baseball

DC Matt and I have pledged to each other not to get political on this blog.  It just makes for a mess.  I’ll just say this, I look forward to reading David Brooks and Tom Friedman in the New York Times each week.

Loyal reader Chris J recently sent me a link to an interview the Daily News of Philadelphia did with Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito.  Love Alito or hate him, the interview makes for fascinating reading.  (Read part one hereRead part two here.)

Interestingly, Alito and I seem to have similar opinions about the scouting/sabermetrics debate:

DN: So you’re more of a sabermetrics guy than a traditionalist?

Alito: Well, I’m very interested in it and I’m attracted to it. I can’t say I really understand it all that well. But it makes a lot of sense to me. I guess it has its limits. But the nature of baseball just lends itself to a statistical analysis.

DN: So if you had a choice of having dinner with Bill James or a top scout, you’d go with Bill James?

Alito: I don’t know. It depends on what the scout would tell me. I think they know things but either they don’t want to tell ordinary people or they have trouble explaining it.

I don’t think you can look at a high school kid, or even a college kid, and tell how that player is going to do in professional baseball. So the scouts have to be able to see something in a very nascent form, which I think is very, very difficult to do. I don’t know what the secret is.

Now, it’s no secret that I’m a National League guy.  Thus, I despise the designated hitter.  I think it’s un-American.  And you know what?  A member of the Supreme Court agrees with me — though not as vehemently:

DN: Finally, and this is kind of frivolous, but do you ever imagine what it would be like if the designed-hitter rule ever came before the Supreme Court?

Alito: [Laughing] I haven’t thought about that. I don’t know what I would say because the purist in me doesn’t like to see changes like that. But it’s not that exciting to see pitchers hit.

Filed under: Uncategorized, , , , , , ,

Baseball Musings

Error: Twitter did not respond. Please wait a few minutes and refresh this page.

Flickr Photos